Ergonomics Poster
Saturday, 20 February 2016
PowerPoint 2: Dance Playlist
PowerPoint Slides 2: Dance Playlist
This description is a detailed analysis of the work we have done, why we did it and how we came across the idea through our passion for music.
This is the boons and the banes slide, pros and cons. Obviously more pros to the music!
Friday, 29 January 2016
Peer reflection Criteria D
Criteria D – Peer Evaluation Rubric for Tech Fair Name of Peer Evaluator: Rania Sarahni
On a scale of 0-5, rate your friend’s blog based on the self-evaluation he/she has done. 5- Very Good, 4- Good, 3 – Satisfactory, 2 - Fair, 1 - Unsatisfactory
Criteria
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Were all the entries complete?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do all the entries relate to what the topic relate to?
|
|
|
|
||
Are there references for the blog entries that required it?
|
|
|
|
||
What does the blog look like? (Is the font colour, style and size appropriate)
|
|
|
|
||
Are there any spelling mistakes, grammar etc?
|
|
|
|
||
Was the Tech Fair idea interesting to you?
|
|
|
|
||
Was the promo video created interesting?
|
|
|
|
How can the blog be improved in your opinion?
There are very few grammar mistakes and the font is bold, which makes it a little hard to read but other than that I believe that everything on Monica’s blog was fine.
Wednesday, 27 January 2016
tech fair self evaluation
Posts on Blog | |
Research on 1 idea related to Tech Fair Project | |
Paragraph which explains what the product is and how does it work | |
References Cited | |
Reflection about the research | |
PowerPoint about the Tech Fair idea posted with minimum 4 slides giving details about the project | |
Promotional Video posted on the blog |
Research reflection
Research reflection
For term 2 we have been in the process of researching an idea for the tech fair, each one of us had to think of an idea for the tech fair, we then had to write a short paragraph about the function of the project and a short description of the materials and process of the object.In my opinion, I believe that I have described the project in a very detailed manner and have talked about in a very descriptive way.Second of all, in my opinion, I think that I have provided very appropriate and necessary information that defined the project properly.Another thing is that I think that I have used my research skills very well and have received great information.Meanwhile, I have also appropriately cited my source of image and information.Finally, last but not least next time a way I can improve is to add a little more visual work in my research and maybe I can describe in a more deep manner so it can be as detailed as possible.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)